<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Running a Reverse Proxy in Apache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html</link>
	<description>Advanced Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:28:48 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mauricio Matias</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html#comment-68536</link>
		<dc:creator>Mauricio Matias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com.com/htaccess/56.html#comment-68536</guid>
		<description>It is hard to read it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to read it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pradyumna</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html#comment-57649</link>
		<dc:creator>pradyumna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com.com/htaccess/56.html#comment-57649</guid>
		<description>Hi,

I want an architecture based on the following scenario.

&lt;ol&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;I will have a server that will play a role of a web server/reverse proxy.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;This proxy server will be placed in my DMZ&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;My applications will be running on the MZ.&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;When some external user will access they have to use _https_ where as internal users should access by _http_&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;The reverse proxy must be able to provide &quot;local&quot; websites (PHP/HTML etc )&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;



Please can someone help me in designing the architecture and how i will do it.

/Pradyumna</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I want an architecture based on the following scenario.</p>
<ol>
<li>I will have a server that will play a role of a web server/reverse proxy.</li>
<li>This proxy server will be placed in my DMZ</li>
<li>My applications will be running on the MZ.</li>
<li>When some external user will access they have to use _https_ where as internal users should access by _http_</li>
<li>The reverse proxy must be able to provide &#8220;local&#8221; websites (PHP/HTML etc )</li>
</ol>
<p>Please can someone help me in designing the architecture and how i will do it.</p>
<p>/Pradyumna</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html#comment-25529</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com.com/htaccess/56.html#comment-25529</guid>
		<description>Could you possibly post the &quot;simplified&quot; example that you mentioned if vhosts were used?

We use virtual hosts extensively, and I&#039;m curious as to how this would be simplified...

Thanks, this is a great read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could you possibly post the &#8220;simplified&#8221; example that you mentioned if vhosts were used?</p>
<p>We use virtual hosts extensively, and I&#8217;m curious as to how this would be simplified&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks, this is a great read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Des</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html#comment-16492</link>
		<dc:creator>Des</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 00:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com.com/htaccess/56.html#comment-16492</guid>
		<description>If backend server returns 302 redirect response can this be &quot;trapped&quot; by proxy and redirected internally without sending response back to client?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If backend server returns 302 redirect response can this be &#8220;trapped&#8221; by proxy and redirected internally without sending response back to client?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dumbo</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html#comment-8030</link>
		<dc:creator>dumbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:00:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com.com/htaccess/56.html#comment-8030</guid>
		<description>Hi,
I have slightly different scenario then the reverse proxy examples given.i have to redirect the incoming requests (http:/)to secured site (https://) and get the data back.
Also there is user authentication.
how can that be acompished in reverse proxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
I have slightly different scenario then the reverse proxy examples given.i have to redirect the incoming requests (http:/)to secured site (https://) and get the data back.<br />
Also there is user authentication.<br />
how can that be acompished in reverse proxy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cd-MaN</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Cd-MaN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com.com/htaccess/56.html#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Hello. I have an issue with mod_proxy I blogged about (http://hype-free.blogspot.com/2006/09/apache-and-modproxy.html). Basically the scenario is the following:
-one internal server with CentOS running an old(er) version of Apache (some 2.0.x) with mod proxy
-the target server out on the web with Windows and a new Apache 2.2
-connections from the proxy to the target server are made through SSL for security reasons
-if keep-alive connections are enabled at every 2-3 requests the proxy says something similar to: &quot;I received an invalid response from an upstream server&quot;. With keep-alive connections disabled everything works fine, but the performance penalty is big, because the encryption has to be renegotiated for every query. Any ideas what could be the problem? I tried to google it by came up with no useful info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. I have an issue with mod_proxy I blogged about (http://hype-free.blogspot.com/2006/09/apache-and-modproxy.html). Basically the scenario is the following:<br />
-one internal server with CentOS running an old(er) version of Apache (some 2.0.x) with mod proxy<br />
-the target server out on the web with Windows and a new Apache 2.2<br />
-connections from the proxy to the target server are made through SSL for security reasons<br />
-if keep-alive connections are enabled at every 2-3 requests the proxy says something similar to: &#8220;I received an invalid response from an upstream server&#8221;. With keep-alive connections disabled everything works fine, but the performance penalty is big, because the encryption has to be renegotiated for every query. Any ideas what could be the problem? I tried to google it by came up with no useful info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LonerVamp</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/htaccess/reverse-proxy-apache.html#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>LonerVamp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 21:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com.com/htaccess/56.html#comment-161</guid>
		<description>This is just FYI. The article says:

&quot;At the time of writing, the reason most commonly cited for not upgrading is difficulties running PHP on Apache 2. I cannot speak from personal experience, but several well-informed sources tell me the difficulty lies with non-thread-safe code in PHP, and that it works well with Apache 2 if it is built with the non-threaded Prefork MPM.&quot;

This was true in Ocftober 2006 when this was updated, but is no longer the issue with the latest Apache and PHP installs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just FYI. The article says:</p>
<p>&#8220;At the time of writing, the reason most commonly cited for not upgrading is difficulties running PHP on Apache 2. I cannot speak from personal experience, but several well-informed sources tell me the difficulty lies with non-thread-safe code in PHP, and that it works well with Apache 2 if it is built with the non-threaded Prefork MPM.&#8221;</p>
<p>This was true in Ocftober 2006 when this was updated, but is no longer the issue with the latest Apache and PHP installs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
