<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AskApache searching on wp-super-cache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.askapache.com/search/wp-super-cache/feed/?withcomments=1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.askapache.com</link>
	<description>Advanced Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 00:37:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on 30x Faster Cache and Site Speed with TMPFS by Matthew Kettlewell</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/optimize/super-speed-secrets.html#comment-3104</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Kettlewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Aug 2012 20:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=3220#comment-3104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where are you finding the directory for the tmpfs files to rsync with?

for instance you have: /_b/tmpfs/cache/

Is there a way ( command ) that will allow me to find this easily?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where are you finding the directory for the tmpfs files to rsync with?</p>
<p>for instance you have: /_b/tmpfs/cache/</p>
<p>Is there a way ( command ) that will allow me to find this easily?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vetted &#8211; Top 3 WordPress Speed Plugins by Paul030</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/wordpress/fastest-caching-plugins.html#comment-2907</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul030</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2011 20:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=3701#comment-2907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three questions:

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Will AACC be updated to work with WP 3.1.1?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Can this work with other cache plugins, like Quick Cache?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Will this work on Cloud hosts like Rackspace?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

Much appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three questions:</p>
<ol>
<li>Will AACC be updated to work with WP 3.1.1?</li>
<li>Can this work with other cache plugins, like Quick Cache?</li>
<li>Will this work on Cloud hosts like Rackspace?</li>
</ol>
<p>Much appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimize a Website for Speed, Security, and Easy Management by AskApache</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/hosting/optimize-website-files-cache-security.html#comment-2826</link>
		<dc:creator>AskApache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 20:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=1380#comment-2826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;@Sean Smith&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;You are correct.  The current (sub/multi)domain structure of askapache is only the 2nd generation of experiments..  I have learned a lot by looking at the methods employed by the best in the business, sites like akamai, google, youtube, gmail, and others and am planning a third generation update of the domain structure.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So far I am planning on using net.cdn.askapache.com img.cdn.askapache.com etc.. type of setup.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In fact the way dns lookups occur, it&#039;s always good to keep the same toplevel domains.  That&#039;s because .info domains have different parents in the dns system than .net and .com, so the DNS is much faster for 2 .coms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Add to that another toplevel domain in common, askapache.com, and another, cdn.askapache.com, and the DNS issue will be optimized greatly.  Then, the additional subdomains of say, img.cdn.askapache.com and cgi.cdn.askapache.com will house different content to optimize several facets of HTTP communication.  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Basically the askapache network has grown much more sophisticated in terms of networking, internal request handling, multiple server installations for different data type, etc.. But the way I do things, slowly I guess, I always pay attention to the details, and everything I do today still pretty much fits this posts philosophy of compartmentalizing and working to work less.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d love to explain more...  rather get it done.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for your comment!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>@Sean Smith</strong></p>
<p>You are correct.  The current (sub/multi)domain structure of askapache is only the 2nd generation of experiments..  I have learned a lot by looking at the methods employed by the best in the business, sites like akamai, google, youtube, gmail, and others and am planning a third generation update of the domain structure.</p>
<p>So far I am planning on using net.cdn.askapache.com img.cdn.askapache.com etc.. type of setup.</p>
<p>In fact the way dns lookups occur, it's always good to keep the same toplevel domains.  That's because .info domains have different parents in the dns system than .net and .com, so the DNS is much faster for 2 .coms.</p>
<p>Add to that another toplevel domain in common, askapache.com, and another, cdn.askapache.com, and the DNS issue will be optimized greatly.  Then, the additional subdomains of say, img.cdn.askapache.com and cgi.cdn.askapache.com will house different content to optimize several facets of HTTP communication.  </p>
<p>Basically the askapache network has grown much more sophisticated in terms of networking, internal request handling, multiple server installations for different data type, etc.. But the way I do things, slowly I guess, I always pay attention to the details, and everything I do today still pretty much fits this posts philosophy of compartmentalizing and working to work less.</p>
<p>I'd love to explain more...  rather get it done.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimize a Website for Speed, Security, and Easy Management by Sean Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/hosting/optimize-website-files-cache-security.html#comment-2825</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 22:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=1380#comment-2825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[static.askapache.com correct me if my train of thought is incorrect hear in saying so but I believe you are taking a performance hit with this setup and should replace that url with another domain name such as static.askapache.info if possible. Since it hasn&#039;t already sent cookies? However I stand to be corrected here as the additional DNS lookup may slow things down as well. What are your thoughts on this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>static.askapache.com correct me if my train of thought is incorrect hear in saying so but I believe you are taking a performance hit with this setup and should replace that url with another domain name such as static.askapache.info if possible. Since it hasn't already sent cookies? However I stand to be corrected here as the additional DNS lookup may slow things down as well. What are your thoughts on this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vetted &#8211; Top 3 WordPress Speed Plugins by Bob Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/wordpress/fastest-caching-plugins.html#comment-2906</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=3701#comment-2906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Really static was about twice as fast according to Google until we upgraded to WP 3.0 now they both come in at 3 seconds.  Y slow says it is 1 second.  So who do you believe?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really static was about twice as fast according to Google until we upgraded to WP 3.0 now they both come in at 3 seconds.  Y slow says it is 1 second.  So who do you believe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 30x Faster Cache and Site Speed with TMPFS by Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/optimize/super-speed-secrets.html#comment-3103</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 11:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=3220#comment-3103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[btw, AskApache, try http://www.dyndns.com/services/springserver/ if you will need fast machines and networks for another project. They put their hosting stuff in next to their DNS hardware which needs to be 1 hop to multiple tierone band width providers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, AskApache, try http://www.dyndns.com/services/springserver/ if you will need fast machines and networks for another project. They put their hosting stuff in next to their DNS hardware which needs to be 1 hop to multiple tierone band width providers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimize a Website for Speed, Security, and Easy Management by kirti</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/hosting/optimize-website-files-cache-security.html#comment-2824</link>
		<dc:creator>kirti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 11:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=1380#comment-2824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice web development articles..  Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice web development articles..  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 30x Faster Cache and Site Speed with TMPFS by mikeytown2</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/optimize/super-speed-secrets.html#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeytown2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=3220#comment-3102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How does this effect requests per second? You mention 30x but I don&#039;t see any ab benchmarks. Main reason I&#039;m asking is linux will cache frequently access files in ram via the buffer cache, so I&#039;m wondering if there is any real benefit to using TMPFS? One way to find out is ab ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does this effect requests per second? You mention 30x but I don't see any ab benchmarks. Main reason I'm asking is linux will cache frequently access files in ram via the buffer cache, so I'm wondering if there is any real benefit to using TMPFS? One way to find out is ab ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimize a Website for Speed, Security, and Easy Management by Yman</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/hosting/optimize-website-files-cache-security.html#comment-2823</link>
		<dc:creator>Yman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 11:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=1380#comment-2823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Good stuff.  Great website management tips!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff.  Great website management tips!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Optimize a Website for Speed, Security, and Easy Management by AskApache</title>
		<link>http://www.askapache.com/hosting/optimize-website-files-cache-security.html#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>AskApache</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 05:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.askapache.com/?p=1380#comment-2822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Thanks guys... by far this is the post with the best comments!  &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;@Dee&lt;/strong&gt; I think people are turned off by my writing style.. I&#039;m actually a really nice guy though!&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys... by far this is the post with the best comments!  </p>
<p><strong>@Dee</strong> I think people are turned off by my writing style.. I'm actually a really nice guy though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
